top of page

Are books from the past better than contemporary ones?

Looking at how writing has changed over time, it's clear there's been quite the transformation. Compare books from different centuries and you'll see a world of difference in their style, structure, and even grammar. Yet, personally, delving into works of the past elevates my reading experience to a transcendent level. Their stories make me think in ways I never imagined, offering fresh perspectives and teaching me so much about culture, society, and even grammar.


So, the question is: Are books from the past truly better than contemporary ones? Let's analyze weighing the merits and drawbacks of both eras' literature:


Are books from the past better than contemporary ones?

Table of Contents:


1. Writing Style and Language:


Older Literature:

Pros:

  1. Eloquence and Sophistication: Writing from the past often exhibits a high level of eloquence and sophistication, with carefully crafted prose and intricate language. This can lend a timeless quality to the work and evoke a sense of literary mastery.

  2. Richness and Depth: Older literature tends to employ complex sentence structures, extensive vocabulary, and literary devices such as metaphors, similes, and allusions. This richness and depth can offer readers a profound and immersive reading experience, allowing for deeper exploration of themes and characters.

  3. Cultural and Historical Significance: The language and style of older literature reflect the cultural and historical context in which it was written, providing valuable insights into the time period, societal norms, and intellectual trends of the era. This can enhance readers' understanding and appreciation of the work.

Cons:

  1. Archaic Language: The language used in older literature may be archaic or outdated, featuring words, phrases, and expressions that are no longer commonly used or understood by modern readers. This can create barriers to comprehension and accessibility, making the text feel distant or alienating.

  2. Verbose and Dense: Older literature often exhibits a tendency towards verbosity and density, with long-winded descriptions, elaborate syntax, and meandering narratives. While this may appeal to readers who appreciate intricate language and nuanced storytelling, it can also be perceived as tedious or cumbersome by those accustomed to more concise and streamlined writing styles.


FINAL SCORE:

3 PROS - 2 CONS = 1 POINT


Contemporary Literature:

Pros:

  1. Clarity and Accessibility: Contemporary literature tends to prioritize clarity and accessibility in language and style, using straightforward prose, simple syntax, and familiar vocabulary. This makes the text more easily understandable and relatable to modern readers, fostering a deeper connection and engagement with the story.

  2. Relevance and Timeliness: The language and style of contemporary literature reflect current linguistic trends, cultural norms, and societal issues, making the text feel relevant and timely. This enables writers to address contemporary themes and concerns with immediacy and authenticity, resonating with readers who seek stories that reflect their own lived experiences.


Cons:

  1. Simplicity and Lack of Depth: In prioritizing clarity and accessibility, contemporary literature may sometimes sacrifice the richness and depth found in older works. The use of simple language and straightforward storytelling techniques can result in a narrative that feels shallow or lacking in complexity, limiting opportunities for nuanced exploration of themes and characters.

  2. Commercial Influence: The commercial pressures of contemporary publishing can sometimes lead to a homogenization of writing styles and a proliferation of formulaic storytelling conventions. This can result in a lack of originality and innovation, with many contemporary works adhering to familiar tropes and narrative formulas, rather than pushing the boundaries of literary expression.


FINAL SCORE:

2 PROS - 2 CONS = 0 POINTS


FINAL RESULT:

Older literature wins in Writing Style!


2. Themes and Subjects:


Older Literature:

Pros:

  1. Historical and Cultural Context: Older literature provides valuable insights into the historical and cultural context in which it was written, shedding light on the values, beliefs, and societal norms of the era. This historical perspective enhances readers' understanding of the text and enriches their appreciation of its thematic depth.

  2. Literary Tradition and Influence: Many works of older literature are considered classics and have had a profound influence on subsequent generations of writers and artists. Studying these canonical texts allows readers to trace the evolution of literary traditions and identify recurring themes and motifs that continue to resonate in contemporary literature.


Cons:

  • I couldn't find a con for this one


FINAL SCORE:

2 PROS - 0 CONS = 2 POINTS


Contemporary Literature:

Pros:

  1. Relevance to Modern Issues: Contemporary literature addresses a wide range of contemporary issues and concerns, including technology, globalization, identity, social justice, and environmental sustainability. By engaging with these timely and pressing issues, contemporary literature offers readers insights into the challenges and complexities of the modern world.

  2. Innovation and Experimentation: Contemporary literature is characterized by a spirit of innovation and experimentation, with writers exploring new forms, genres, and narrative techniques. This creative freedom allows for greater artistic expression and imaginative storytelling, pushing the boundaries of literary convention and expanding the possibilities of what literature can achieve.

Cons:

  1. Risk of Over-Saturation: The proliferation of contemporary literature in a globalized digital age can sometimes lead to a glut of mediocre or derivative works that lack originality or depth. The sheer volume of books being published can make it difficult for readers to discern quality literature from commercialized mass-market products, potentially diluting the overall literary landscape.


FINAL SCORE:

2 PROS - 1 CONS = 1 POINT


FINAL RESULT:

Older literature wins in Themes and Subjects!


3. Cultural References:


Older Literature:

Pros:

  1. Historical Context: Older literature often contains cultural references that provide valuable insights into the historical context in which the work was written. These references may include allusions to historical events, figures, and movements that were significant at the time, enriching readers' understanding of the text and its thematic concerns.

  2. Literary Tradition: Many works of older literature are steeped in literary tradition and draw on a rich tapestry of myths, legends, and classical texts. These intertextual references create layers of meaning and resonance, connecting the work to broader literary and cultural traditions and enhancing its literary depth and complexity.


Cons:

  1. Obscurity and Inaccessibility: Cultural references in older literature may be obscure or unfamiliar to modern readers, particularly those from different cultural backgrounds or historical contexts. Without sufficient knowledge of the cultural references, readers may struggle to fully appreciate the nuances and layers of meaning in the text, leading to a sense of alienation or exclusion.


FINAL SCORE:

2 PROS - 1 CONS = 1 POINT


Contemporary Literature:

Pros:

  1. Engagement with Contemporary Issues: Cultural references in contemporary literature often engage with contemporary issues and concerns, such as technology, social media, globalization, and identity politics. By addressing these timely and pressing issues, contemporary literature provides readers with insights into the complexities of the modern world and encourages critical reflection and dialogue.

Cons:

  1. Futility: In today's literary scene, there's a noticeable trend where many books prioritize entertainment over substance. Unfortunately, this often leads to a disregard for deeper cultural exploration once there is a market preference for superficiality and triviality. Consequently, writers, often resort to producing books that cater to this demand for futility. Thus, the allure of profit can overshadow the pursuit of meaningful cultural exploration in modern literature.

  2. Overreliance on Pop Culture: Some contemporary literature may rely too heavily on fleeting pop culture references or trends, sacrificing depth and substance for surface-level relevance or novelty. This overreliance on pop culture can detract from the overall quality and literary merit of the work, reducing it to a product of its time rather than a timeless work of art.

FINAL SCORE:

1 PROS - 2 CONS = - 1 POINT


FINAL RESULT:

Older literature wins in Cultural References!


4. Educational Value:


Older Literature:

Pros:

  1. Language Enrichment: Older literature often features rich and complex language, including extensive vocabulary, varied sentence structures, and literary devices such as metaphors, allusions, and symbolism. Reading older works can help expand readers' vocabulary and improve their language skills, making them valuable educational resources for language acquisition and development.

  2. Thematic Depth: Many works of older literature explore profound and timeless themes such as love, power, morality, and the human condition, offering readers opportunities for deep philosophical reflection and intellectual engagement. Studying these classic texts can foster critical thinking skills and encourage students to grapple with complex moral and ethical questions, enhancing their intellectual growth and emotional maturity.

  3. Cultural and Historical Context: Older literature provides valuable insights into the historical and cultural context in which it was written, offering students opportunities to learn about different time periods, societies, and cultural movements. Studying these works can deepen students' understanding of history, literature, and the humanities, fostering a more nuanced appreciation of diverse cultural perspectives and intellectual traditions.

Cons:

  1. Language Barriers: The rich and complex language of older literature may pose challenges for some students, particularly those with limited language proficiency or reading comprehension skills. The archaic vocabulary, syntax, and style of older works can create barriers to understanding and accessibility, potentially alienating students and impeding their engagement with the text.


FINAL SCORE:

3 PROS - 1 CONS = 2 POINTS


Contemporary Literature:

Pros:

  1. Accessibility: Contemporary literature often features clear and straightforward language, making it more accessible to a wide range of students, including those with diverse language proficiency levels or learning styles. The contemporary vernacular and relatable narrative styles of these works can help engage students and foster a love of reading and learning.

  2. Relevance to Students' Lives: Contemporary literature addresses contemporary issues and concerns that are relevant to students' lives, such as technology, social media, identity, and mental health. Reading contemporary works allows students to see themselves reflected in the characters and themes, facilitating greater empathy, self-awareness, and social consciousness.

Cons:

  1. Shallow Themes: Some contemporary literature may prioritize entertainment value and commercial appeal over thematic depth and intellectual rigor. The focus on relatable and accessible storytelling can sometimes result in narratives that lack complexity or nuance, offering shallow treatments of important issues or resorting to formulaic plots and characters.

  2. Commercial Influences: The commercial pressures of contemporary publishing can sometimes lead to an overemphasis on marketability and conformity to commercial trends, potentially stifling creativity, originality, and diversity in literature. Students may be exposed to a narrow range of genres, styles, and perspectives that align with dominant commercial interests, limiting their exposure to diverse voices and viewpoints in literature.


FINAL SCORE:

2 PROS - 2 CONS = -0 POINTS


FINAL RESULT:

Older literature wins in Educational Value


CONCLUSION

While it's evident that older literature holds a special allure for me, it's crucial to acknowledge that this article is rooted in my personal perspective rather than objective facts. As highlighted, both older and contemporary literature possess their own set of strengths and weaknesses. Embracing a diverse range of literary works can enrich our understanding and broaden our horizons. However, it's disheartening to observe a growing indifference towards older literature among many readers today, with a preference for modern books prevailing. There's nothing inherently wrong with this preference, but I hope this article serves as a gentle reminder of the hidden treasures waiting to be discovered within the pages of older literary works.

Comments


Sign up for our Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter for handpicked book recommendations, valuable tips, and honest reviews.

Thanks for submitting!

bottom of page